Battle lines drawn over electoral reform

By on November 13, 2017
NDP leader John Horgan arrives for TV election debate in Vancouver, April 2017. Urban support shifted in his favour enough to form a minority government with B.C. Green Party support. (Black Press files).

Premier John Horgan says rural voters will be protected.

The B.C. NDP-Green government is pressing ahead with its plan to change the voting system in time for the next provincial election, and is facing bitter opposition from the B.C. Liberals.

MLAs have been debating two major changes, one to replace corporate and union donations with a public subsidy based on previous votes, and another to adopt a still-undefined system of proportional representation.

The system is to be defined by the government and put to a referendum to be held by the fall of 2018. Unlike the past two province-wide votes on the issue, this referendum is to be decided by a simple majority of all participating voters, without requiring support from a majority of constituencies.

Without regional support, the referendum will likely be decided by the southwest corner of the province, where three quarters of the population resides. Metro Vancouver alone is home to more than half of B.C.’s 4.6 million people.

Debate has been harshly divided. Prince George-Mackenzie MLA Mike Morris is among the opposition members accusing the NDP and Greens of a “backroom deal” to remake the voting and party financing system to favour themselves.

MORE: TEGART: Proportional representation would be bad for rural B.C.
               LETTERS: Tegart’s view on electoral reform misguided

“They say that the choice of an electoral system is one of the most important institutional decisions for any democracy, but here we have this government that is rushing this legislation through without any public consultation,” Morris told the legislature Nov. 2. “Yet they’re consulting on ride sharing. They’re consulting on Site C. They’re consulting on the Massey Tunnel. They’re consulting on the foreign buyers tax. They’re consulting on ICBC.”

Premier John Horgan has promised that rural representation will be protected in a new system, but that too has yet to be defined.

B.C. already has a law that requires regular judicial review of the distribution of MLA seats. In the last two reviews, the former government required that rural and northern seats not be merged or eliminated due to low population. Stikine, home of Forests Minister Doug Donaldson, is a vast northwest region with a population of less than 21,000 people, which is more than 60 per cent less than the average population of B.C.’s 87 constituencies. Surrey-Fleetwood has a population of more than 60,000, and new seats were added to Surrey and Richmond for the 2017 election to reflect their growth.

“We have deviations in our seat sizes in terms of population that are completely out of whack with other jurisdictions in Canada,” Horgan told Black Press. “So I’m not surprised that there is concern that we take every step to preserve rural representation. It’s fundamental to British Columbians, and I’m committed to make sure that happens.

“But I’m not going to shy away from the need to change a system that fundamentally gives 100 per cent power to less than 50 per cent of the voters.”

One Comment

  1. Megan Ardyche

    November 14, 2017 at 10:10 am

    BC can certainly devise a made-in-Canada system that will protect rural seats and ensure they have representation. Indeed, with proportional representation, rural voters will finally have real representation. Right now, on Vancouver Island, if you don’t vote NDP you don’t have representation. In Northern BC, if you don’t vote Liberal, you don’t have representation. The Greens and the Conservatives have essentially no representation. Liberals are terrified they will lose their strangle-hold, so they’re trying to scare as many people as possible.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *